Start Submission

Reading: Addressing the Inadequacies: A New Multi-Faceted Solution to Double Hatting in ISDS

Download

A- A+
Alt. Display

Research

Addressing the Inadequacies: A New Multi-Faceted Solution to Double Hatting in ISDS

Author:

Mohit Kumar Tanwar

Jamia Millia Islamia, IN
About Mohit
Mohit Kumar Tanwar is a final year law student at Faculty of Law, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India. He enjoys writing, both academic and otherwise, and has been previously published on The Human Rights Blog, and is also the Co-Editor of 'The short Mag', a literary magazine.
X close

Abstract

In Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS), ‘double hatting’, or the playing of multiple roles by arbitrators in different ISDS proceedings as counsels, expert witnesses, or tribunal secretaries, is a problematic phenomenon. This deplorable practice results in the monopolization of power and builds up suspicions regarding such arbitrators’ impartiality which, in turn, threatens the legitimacy of the whole ISDS regime itself. Therefore, to sustain the current ISDS system as a viable dispute resolution option for investors and states, there is a need to regulate double hatting at the earliest. To that end, numerous solutions to this problem have been forwarded by scholars and international bodies alike. The recently proposed Draft Code of Conduct for Adjudicators in ISDS is a significant development in this field. However, all of these solutions are either unviable or inadequate as they fail to account for the variations in the forms and intensities of double hatting. To remedy this lacuna, this article analyses the existing proposals, including the Draft Code of Conduct, and, thereafter, develops a more comprehensive solution by inculcating measures such as compulsory disclosure requirements and temporal bans. Further, it adapts these measures to regulate, and minimize, concurrent and successive double hatting across different classes of arbitral proceedings. By doing so, this article adopts a novel, multi-faceted approach to overcome the problem on a case-by-case basis, serving its aim of bringing to the table a viable and effective solution—one that ticks the maximum boxes—to resolve the menace of double hatting.
How to Cite: Tanwar, M.K., 2021. Addressing the Inadequacies: A New Multi-Faceted Solution to Double Hatting in ISDS. LSE Law Review, 7(1), pp.115–165.
Published on 14 Nov 2021.
Peer Reviewed

Downloads

  • PDF (EN)

    comments powered by Disqus